Home

[June 2, 2008]

Asset Location - Increase Investing Returns & Reduce Your Taxes

Filed under: High Yield Investment Programs — @ 1:17 pm

Location - Once the holy grail only for real estate investors is fast becoming the mantra for every stock, bond, and mutual fund investor. Experts and studies now recognize managing asset location is second only to asset allocation in determining the success of your investment returns.

Importance of Asset Location:
Asset location is a cornerstone to success for a simple reason. Taxable accounts differ from tax-deferred accounts {401(k), IRA and similar retirement}. Taxable accounts require you to pay income tax on every dividend and capital gain generated by your investments. This tax substantially reduces the amount of reinvestment and annual investment growth. On the other hand, retirement accounts defer taxes allowing returns to compound without penalty and at a substantially faster rate. Asset location refers to the optimal placement of securities between taxable and tax-deferred accounts. Good choices reward investors with long-term compounding and significantly higher returns. Poor choices, or more commonly, no choice, leads to below average results.

The effects are striking. Investors lose up to 20% of their after-tax returns by mislocating investments in the wrong type of account. So says a recent study from three finance professors Robert Dammon and Chester S. Spatt, of Carnegie Mellon University, and Harold H. Zhang of the University of North Carolina. The professors analyzed two asset classes, stocks and bonds, to determine suitability for investing within tax-deferred accounts. Their conclusion? Investors should keep equities in taxable accounts and bonds in tax-deferred accounts, to the greatest extent possible. Young investors stand the most to gain by following such advice. Three of the most powerful elements of investing — dividends, deferred taxes, and compounding interest - combine for a staggering effect to retirement income.

Unfortunately, the typical investor never takes advantage of all three benefits. A recent Federal Reserve survey shows Americans invest their taxable and tax-deferred accounts with identical securities. People focus on individual accounts rather than their entire portfolio. They ignore the benefits of allocating investments among different accounts and wind up with several accounts all holding the exact same thing. To their detriment, nearly half of all investors own bonds in taxable accounts and stocks in tax-deferred accounts.

Why asset location works:
Tax efficiency is more important than ever. Two recent changes have driven asset location strategy. Last year’s tax cut, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, slashed top tax rates on dividends from 35% to 15%. Those same dividends, however, would be taxed at the ordinary rate (up to 35%) when withdrawn from a retirement account. The new law further cut taxes on capital gains from 20% to 15%. Since most equity investments generate returns from both dividends and capital gains, investors realize lower tax bills when holding stocks or equity mutual funds within a taxable account.

Similarly, fixed-income investments (e.g. bonds) and real estate trusts generate a regular flow of cash. These interest payments are subject to the same ordinary income tax rates of up to 35%. A tax-deferred retirement account provides investors with the best possible shelter for such securities and their resulting profits.

Which investment goes where?
Fortunately, your asset location strategy can be relatively simple. Place highly taxed assets in the tax-deferred accounts first. Anything left over can go into the taxable accounts. From the academic study, the professors concluded with three general rules to help with the decision process. First, locate taxable bonds, real estate investment trusts (REITs) and related mutual funds into tax-deferred accounts. Second, locate stocks and equity mutual funds into taxable accounts - even if you are an active trader and generate substantial short-term gains. Third, never buy a municipal bond until you completely fill tax-deferred accounts with taxable bonds or REITs. The combination of compounding and deferring taxes on the higher yields of corporate bonds is. If all this sounds a little overwhelming, just consult the table below.

Table 1: Asset Locations for High Returns and Minimal Taxes.

TAXABLE ACCOUNTS
– Stocks
– Tax-free or tax-deferred bonds (munis, treasuries, and savings bonds)
– Mutual funds investing in stocks or tax-advantaged bonds

TAX-DEFERRED ACCOUNTS (traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, and deferred annuities)
– Taxable bonds (corporates, zeroes, TIPS, and high yields)
– REITS (Real Estate Investment Trusts)
– Mutual funds investing in taxable bonds or REITS

Two exceptions are worth noting. First, qualified distributions from Roth IRAs are tax free. Generally speaking, place assets with the greatest potential for returns inside a Roth. Second, if a 401(k) or IRA holds all (or nearly all) your investment money, throw this article away and focus only on asset allocation.

Summary:
You, as an informed investor, can take control over taxes and related expenses to your investment returns. Allocate your investments to reduce risk and increase returns. Locate your investments by managing all your accounts to minimize the tax drag on your financial returns.

Tim Olson

TheAssetAdvisor.com

Mr. Olson is the editor of The Asset Advisor, a financial investment service providing proven strategies for no-load mutual fund investors. He brings 26 years of education and experience from Stanford University, Ernst & Young financial consulting, personal wealth management, and venture capital investing.

Subscribe to our free newsletter

[May 24, 2008]

Building Wealth Quickly - The Best Trading Method For Fast Gains

Filed under: High Yield Investment Programs — @ 11:19 pm

If you want to build wealth quickly then you need to use leverage and a proven trading method.

Do it the right way and you will make get rich, do it the wrong way and you will lose. So let’s look at how to build wealth quickly the right way.

First things first!

If you want to build wealth quickly then you need to take responsibility for your actions and do it all for yourself - You can’t rely on brokers, gurus or friends.

Do your homework

You are going to need a trading plan and this involves doing your homework.

The good news is you can learn to trade an effective technical trading method quickly and the best method is a breakout method, we will come back to this in a minute.

The best market to trade

The global currency markets remain the best market to trade as they trend well.

A trend is simply the tendency of a market to move in the same direction for a period of time.

Look at any currency and you will see trends that last for months or years and these need to be captured to make wealth quickly.

Currencies are great markets for technical trend following and your aim is to capitalize on these trends.

Make you money work harder

FOREX brokers will grant leverage up to 100:1 so have $10,000 in your account and you could be trading a million! Leverage of course is a double edged sword, as it can hurt as well as help you.

But if you trade with the odds in your favour and strict money management, you can build wealth quickly. Sure, you will have losers but the big trends you will capture will more than compensate.

Discipline

This really is the key.

It takes great discipline to cut losses and run profits. In fact, the running of profits is the hardest bit - Why?

Because traders hate seeing open profit lost, they therefore want to take a profit quickly in case it gets away. In the end they bank too early and miss the really big money

Well we know currency trends last a long time so you need to be patient and hold on! It takes great mental discipline to accept huge gains and build wealth quickly.

Your method will help

A breakout method works because it is against human nature and normal investment wisdom. ” Buy low sell high” is normal accepted trading wisdom, but it’s dead wrong!

Why?

Because, you are predicting what the market may do, instead of waiting for confirmation of a trend in motion.

A breakout method does the exact opposite by recommending:

“Buy high sell higher” when prices break to new highs you buy - Other investors will be waiting for the pullback which of course never comes.

Just take a look at any currency trend and you will see the major moves hardly ever pull back - The biggest moves start from important market highs.

Trading this way is not comfortable but makes money.

Most traders hate to miss part of the move, that’s why they can’t enter their greedy and want the pullback and of course it never comes, but if enter the market in this way the odds favour you and you will be on the trend and the other investors will be dreaming of the one that got away.

It also helps to cut your losses - Why?

Because, you can position the stop right below the breakout point - Generally if the trend develops it will swiftly move away from the breakout point.

This means you can get your stop up quickly sit back and wait for the trend to build you wealth quickly.

Don’t trade often

With this method the big moves only come a few times a year and you will trade them not the market noise. There is no correlation between how often you trade and profits.

If you want constant action or excitement pick another business.

If you want to build wealth quickly then research the above in greater detail and check the facts - It makes perfect logical sense and very few traders do it, the majority lose and that’s actually a good thing for traders who have courage to trade the breakout.

For more FREE info

On how to create wealth quickly and to get a FREE Currency newsletter as well as other valuable trading tools to enhnace your trading visit: http://www.wellingtoncr.com

http://www.net-planet.org

[April 18, 2008]

Sector Watch: Software Looking Good, Pharmaceuticals (Still) Looking Weak

Filed under: High Yield Investment Programs — @ 5:56 pm

April 8, 2006

The overall market choppiness since the beginning of 2006 has made it tough for investors to find trading opportunities. However, there are a handful of developing bullish and bearish sector trends that are worth a closer look. All of these trends are based on weekly - and even monthly - data, which weeds out the day-to-day noise that has been unusually loud over the last month. As such, a day or two worth of contra-movement can’t be taken to heart. These ideas are much ‘bigger picture’.

The Stealth Rally

Although the NASDAQ has lethargically trailed the S&P (as well as the Dow) in hitting new highs, many traders may be surprised to know that technology stocks have actually had a pretty good year. At no recent point has the sector been a top-performer, but it’s in the top three or four sectors in 5-day, 20-day, monthly, and six-month rankings. The fact that it has consistently been strong without ever being red hot has allowed the sector to quietly develop some momentum, without inviting waves of profit-taking that eventually cause in implosion. In other words, tech is in a nice stealth rally that is likely poised to continue.

The average tech stock P/E is at 32.2, which actually isn’t bad for technology. Profit margins are at a decent 10.17 percent.

The chart of the Dow Jones Technology Index (DJUSTC) looks like it may finally reward investors who have been waiting patiently for the fundamental data to work its way into share prices. The index had met resistance around 540 several times since 2002, including a handful of recent encounters. That persistence has paid off, in that the index is now 550, and still itching to go higher. Its MACD lines are showing a renewed acceleration.

Realistically, we’re watching 600 as a potential reversal point. That’s the high point reached in early 2002, and was also the last gasp before the death blow was inflicted that sent the index to 250 by October of that year. If we get past that level, then the tech stocks could really get moving, especially if the fundamentals continue to improve as they are. And even if 600 is a problem, that would still mean about a 9 percent gain between here and there.

Software - The Stealthiest of the Stealth

Of all the technology industries that are doing well, software appears to be the most viable opportunity. That’s not because it’s leading the pack, but because it has trailed all the major industries in the sector over the last six months. Since October, the average software stock has gained 15.4 percent……and that’s the weakest industry. The fact that it has lagged, though, just means these names are still at least a little undervalued. Pair that fact up with a chart of these stocks, and you have a pretty interesting investment idea.

In fact, the chart of the CBOE GSTI Software Index (GSO) pretty much mirrors the Dow Jones Technology Index, in that it’s developing some momentum while working to break above some resistance. The CBOE Software Index chart’s key resistance line is at 176, where it topped out in late 2004. After a good-sized correction, the index is back up to 172, and itching to go higher on the heels of its newly-found buyers.

To view charts of the Dow Jones Technology Index & the CBOE Software Index, click here: http://bluegrassportfolio.com/sectorwatcharchives/040806sectorreview.html

The average software company P/E is 25.1, while the net profit margin is 23.5 percent. Both of those measures are basically tops within the tech sector, which is precisely why the market should be giving a strong second look to software names.

Healthcare - Still in trouble, thanks to pharmaceuticals

While the broad healthcare sector should almost always be a core component of any portfolio, it doesn’t change the fact that these names have been a surprising disappointment over the last few months. Since this time in October, the healthcare sector is up 6.2 percent. That only tops consumer staples and utilities, which have six-month gains of 6.1 percent and 5.3 percent, respectively. The S&P 500, however, has improved by 8.8 percent during that time. That may seem like a trivial difference. But, given that that the average return of the sectors that have beaten healthcare stocks since then is a whopping 18 percent, what you have is a clear reason to focus on the top performers, and avoid the weak areas such as healthcare.

The chart of the Dow Jones Healthcare Index (DJUSHC) illustrates the problem very well, with a tumble from 325.94 to 314.77 right now that triggered a bearish MACD crossunder signal. Such a signal is no small matter, as they have historically spotted the beginning of rather large downward moves. Is this dip justified? The typical healthcare P/E is 31.4, and margins are a decent 11.2 percent. That’s actually respectable, so why is the sector still struggling? An investor should know that the healthcare sector’s single biggest component is pharmaceutical stocks, which have literally been dragging down the sector.

The pharmaceutical stocks are truly the only major group to not participate in this bull market. At all. Between March of 2003, which was the end of the bear market and beginning of the market recovery, the Dow Jones Pharmaceuticals Index (DJUSPR) is down by 9.7 percent. By comparison, the S&P 500 is up 53.4 percent. And sadly, the losing trend for pharma doesn’t look like it’s going to end anytime soon, primarily for fundamental reasons.

The entire pharmaceutical industry has been falling for so long, the market doesn’t really know how to do anything with these stocks except sell them. Old habits like this are hard to break, as we saw just last month when the rally attempt failed. The Dow Pharmaceuticals Index was able to reach as high as 262.61, but then came tumbling down to 252.43 by the end of March. The current reading of 251.50 is only making the matter a little worse. As a result of that selloff, a couple of key resistance lines were defined. These lines extend all the way back to early 2004….evidence of just how long and things have been tough on the likes of Pfizer (PFE), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), and Glaxo (GSK).

The toughest part for these companies is that they’re actually doing pretty well in terms of sales and profits. It’s just that the underlying stocks aren’t reflecting that performance. The average P/E of 19.30 makes them a bargain, and profit margins of 18.0 percent should be attract to most anyone. Yet clearly, these stocks continue to go unloved. At some point in time, the market will look past the history of these companies and their stocks, but until that happens, investors are content to leave big pharma alone.

But even taking the pharmaceutical stocks out of the equation, the healthcare sector just doesn’t seem to be able to get anything bullish going. The healthcare providers and equipment providers are both I the red for the year, while biotech is barely in the plus column so far. The leading healthcare sector year-to-date is, ironically, pharmaceuticals. In the grand scheme of things, though, the bearish illness seems to have infected the entire sector.

James Brumley is a freelance writer and investment manager. His company Bluegrass Portfolio Management offers retail and institutional investors a performance-oriented recommendation service. Visit http://www.bluegrassportfolio.com for more information.

Mr. Brumley can be contacted by e-mail at james@bluegrassportfolio.com.

Bluegrass Portfolio Management, LLC is registered with the state of Kentucky, under the Kentucky Securities Act. All information contained herein is for informational purposes only for U.S. residents and does not constitute a solicitation or offer to sell securities or investment advisory services. Such an offer can only be made in states where Bluegrass Portfolio Management, LLC is registered or where an exemption from registration is available. Representatives of the firm may only conduct business in a State if the firm and its representatives are approved to do business in the State or are exempted from its registration requirements.


RSS